<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia is hilarious&#8230; sorta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smoothharold.com/wikipedia-is-hilarious-sorta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/wikipedia-is-hilarious-sorta/</link>
	<description>Husband, father, writer, and proprietor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:33:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sandberg</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/wikipedia-is-hilarious-sorta/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sandberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/wp/?p=538#comment-781</guid>
		<description>I agree with your statement &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;It&#039;s the closest &#039;no spin zone&#039; I&#039;ve found on the internet.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most other places online you will see a lot more bias and the author usually has some agenda, which isn&#039;t necessarily bad, unless it is presented as being objective. However on Wikipedia you can generally trust that no one is trying to sell you anything or convince you of their point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your statement </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s the closest &#8216;no spin zone&#8217; I&#8217;ve found on the internet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most other places online you will see a lot more bias and the author usually has some agenda, which isn&#8217;t necessarily bad, unless it is presented as being objective. However on Wikipedia you can generally trust that no one is trying to sell you anything or convince you of their point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Page</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/wikipedia-is-hilarious-sorta/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/wp/?p=538#comment-780</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is really inconsistent. Some of it is great info, and I use Wikipedia often, but there is plenty of info from people on an agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is really inconsistent. Some of it is great info, and I use Wikipedia often, but there is plenty of info from people on an agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/wikipedia-is-hilarious-sorta/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/wp/?p=538#comment-778</guid>
		<description>@ first david,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I didn&#039;t. :) But the point is it&#039;s still vandalism thus hurting the quality of Wikipedia.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;@ David Rogers,&lt;br/&gt;That&#039;s a dilemma I currently don&#039;t have to deal with as my daughter is only 16 months old. It would appear that for children, Britanica thus would be a better, albeit slower source of information for adolescence. Interesting commentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ first david,</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t. :) But the point is it&#8217;s still vandalism thus hurting the quality of Wikipedia.</p>
<p>@ David Rogers,<br />That&#8217;s a dilemma I currently don&#8217;t have to deal with as my daughter is only 16 months old. It would appear that for children, Britanica thus would be a better, albeit slower source of information for adolescence. Interesting commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/wikipedia-is-hilarious-sorta/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/wp/?p=538#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Which concerns me. My children use this tool for elementary/Junior High/Senior High research. Not sure I&#039;m sold on free-form, user-generated information. That said, not sure that the editorial boards of traditional information sources will always be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which concerns me. My children use this tool for elementary/Junior High/Senior High research. Not sure I&#8217;m sold on free-form, user-generated information. That said, not sure that the editorial boards of traditional information sources will always be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/wikipedia-is-hilarious-sorta/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/wp/?p=538#comment-773</guid>
		<description>But the question is .. did you fix it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the question is .. did you fix it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

