<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The year 2000 as predicted by 1930 fashion designers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smoothharold.com/the-year-2000-as-predicted-by-1930-fashion-designers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/the-year-2000-as-predicted-by-1930-fashion-designers/</link>
	<description>Husband, father, writer, and proprietor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:33:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cami</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/the-year-2000-as-predicted-by-1930-fashion-designers/comment-page-1/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>cami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/the-year-2000-as-predicted-by-1930-fashion-designers/#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>WEll they were right about men being equipped with a phone!  But thats funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WEll they were right about men being equipped with a phone!  But thats funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/the-year-2000-as-predicted-by-1930-fashion-designers/comment-page-1/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/the-year-2000-as-predicted-by-1930-fashion-designers/#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>Funny thing is that some of those predictions are accurate. No dresses altogether...Men not ties nothing fancy...Tranparent tops.  

Interesting how some designers were closer than others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing is that some of those predictions are accurate. No dresses altogether&#8230;Men not ties nothing fancy&#8230;Tranparent tops.  </p>
<p>Interesting how some designers were closer than others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/the-year-2000-as-predicted-by-1930-fashion-designers/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/the-year-2000-as-predicted-by-1930-fashion-designers/#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>Oooh, swish!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, swish!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/the-year-2000-as-predicted-by-1930-fashion-designers/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/the-year-2000-as-predicted-by-1930-fashion-designers/#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>&quot;Females will be fitted with a net, likely to catch a male.&quot;

Too funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Females will be fitted with a net, likely to catch a male.&#8221;</p>
<p>Too funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

