<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Smooth Harold, The Blog of Blake Snow &#187; newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smoothharold.com/tag/newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smoothharold.com</link>
	<description>Husband, father, writer, and proprietor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:08:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dear Smooth Harold: New mom wants to renege promise to return to work</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/dear-smooth-harold-new-mom-wants-to-renege-promise-to-return-to-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/dear-smooth-harold-new-mom-wants-to-renege-promise-to-return-to-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Smooth Harold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mormons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self help]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=7381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since first subscribing to the daily paper this summer, I&#8217;ve been exposed to more Dear Abby columns than a 1950s trophy wife. The last one I read was horribly political, so I decided to guide the advice-seeker myself. Here goes:
Dear Smooth Harold: My husband wanted to postpone having children until we were more financially secure. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/dear-smooth-harold-new-mom-wants-to-renege-promise-to-return-to-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reason no. 372 the iPad isn&#8217;t &#8220;magical&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/reason-no-372-the-ipad-isnt-magical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/reason-no-372-the-ipad-isnt-magical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 18:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=4117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As this report so eloquently states, media is still best consumed with a mouse and keyboard, passive video, or with opposing hands leafing through pages of information. &#8220;Interactive media&#8221; as seen on the iPad is as useful as &#8220;multimedia CD-ROM dictionaries&#8221; from the 1990s, m&#8217;kay?
Now if you&#8217;re talking about entertainment, I&#8217;m all for gesture based [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/reason-no-372-the-ipad-isnt-magical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to save newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/how-to-save-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/how-to-save-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/how-to-save-newspapers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time Magazine is wrong.
As newspapers &#8212; and by extension 80% of all original reporting &#8211;  face extinction, along with print, the magazine says websites should charge $.10/day or $2/month to access the news. Author Walter Isaacson says this will offset the loss of subscription and classified revenue so creative journalists can still &#8220;get paid&#8221;  in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/how-to-save-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some of America’s most venerable newspapers face extinction</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/some-of-america%e2%80%99s-most-venerable-newspapers-face-extinction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/some-of-america%e2%80%99s-most-venerable-newspapers-face-extinction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/some-of-america%e2%80%99s-most-venerable-newspapers-face-extinction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economist.com — &#8220;Pick almost any American newspaper company and you can tell a similar story. The ABC reported that for the 530 biggest dailies, average circulation in the past six months was 3.6% lower than in the same period a year earlier; for Sunday papers, it was 4.6% lower. Ad revenues are plunging across the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/some-of-america%e2%80%99s-most-venerable-newspapers-face-extinction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

