<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshoping children looks trashy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smoothharold.com/photoshoping-children-looks-trashy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/photoshoping-children-looks-trashy/</link>
	<description>Husband, father, writer, and proprietor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:33:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/photoshoping-children-looks-trashy/comment-page-1/#comment-1572</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/photoshoping-children-looks-trashy/#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>photo editing is a must, but with Greenberg I actually highly doubt there was much editing going on in post production.  This &quot;plastic-y look&quot; was not brought on by photoshop but by controlled studio lighting.  She has a light on each side of the subject, one above pointed to the top of their head, and one facing their face.  It&#039;s a pretty simple way of getting that popped-out look and it&#039;s become quite popular in photography in the last couple of years.

I work in an in-house studio for design and photography and we&#039;ve mimicked this approach a few times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>photo editing is a must, but with Greenberg I actually highly doubt there was much editing going on in post production.  This &#8220;plastic-y look&#8221; was not brought on by photoshop but by controlled studio lighting.  She has a light on each side of the subject, one above pointed to the top of their head, and one facing their face.  It&#8217;s a pretty simple way of getting that popped-out look and it&#8217;s become quite popular in photography in the last couple of years.</p>
<p>I work in an in-house studio for design and photography and we&#8217;ve mimicked this approach a few times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annette</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/photoshoping-children-looks-trashy/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/photoshoping-children-looks-trashy/#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>I could not agree with you more!!! These poor kids look like they have some serious problems. Like the ole saying goes, &quot;A picture is worth a thousand words!&quot; Let the original photograph tell the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree with you more!!! These poor kids look like they have some serious problems. Like the ole saying goes, &#8220;A picture is worth a thousand words!&#8221; Let the original photograph tell the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

