<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ads for Microsoft Office 2007 are futile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smoothharold.com/new-microsoft-office-ads-are-futile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/new-microsoft-office-ads-are-futile/</link>
	<description>Husband, father, writer, and proprietor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:33:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Styrofoam Sheets %0A</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/new-microsoft-office-ads-are-futile/comment-page-1/#comment-4860</link>
		<dc:creator>Styrofoam Sheets %0A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/wp/?p=730#comment-4860</guid>
		<description>i use both open office and microsoft office and i would say that microsoft office is more responsive and user friendly -,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use both open office and microsoft office and i would say that microsoft office is more responsive and user friendly -,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liquid Vitamin :</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/new-microsoft-office-ads-are-futile/comment-page-1/#comment-4820</link>
		<dc:creator>Liquid Vitamin :</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/wp/?p=730#comment-4820</guid>
		<description>Microsroft Office is still the best program when it comes to spreadsheet and word processing;&#039;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsroft Office is still the best program when it comes to spreadsheet and word processing;&#8217;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RussellPage</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/new-microsoft-office-ads-are-futile/comment-page-1/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>RussellPage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/wp/?p=730#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>The funny thing is, any CTO who is going to buy it for his company already knows about it and anybody who is on the edge is going to read the news/reviews about it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1 - Spend more money developing a better product.&lt;br/&gt;2 - Spend more on PR and less on ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing is, any CTO who is going to buy it for his company already knows about it and anybody who is on the edge is going to read the news/reviews about it.</p>
<p>1 &#8211; Spend more money developing a better product.<br />2 &#8211; Spend more on PR and less on ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/new-microsoft-office-ads-are-futile/comment-page-1/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/wp/?p=730#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I like Office 2007 better than 2003, which I really liked more than XP, which was an improvement over 2000, etc.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That said, I&#039;m no more productive now than I was 7 years ago.  (Although Outlook 2007 is dead sexy.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I like Office 2007 better than 2003, which I really liked more than XP, which was an improvement over 2000, etc.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m no more productive now than I was 7 years ago.  (Although Outlook 2007 is dead sexy.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

