<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is anyone overwhelmed by Google search results?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smoothharold.com/is-anyone-overwhelmed-by-google-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/is-anyone-overwhelmed-by-google-search-results/</link>
	<description>Husband, father, writer, and proprietor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:33:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tyson</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/is-anyone-overwhelmed-by-google-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-4059</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=3525#comment-4059</guid>
		<description>I have mixed thoughts. I use Bing a lot more than I ever thought I would (and I&#039;ve been using Google since &#039;98 or &#039;99). I think Bing does a lot of things better than Google does. I do think that Bing does a better job of organizing its search results. The problem I see is that most web users should be savvy enough to refine their search terms to the point that their results don&#039;t need much organization (thus mooting the benefit provided by Bing).

Microsoft&#039;s ads or a little silly. But they aren&#039;t nearly as silly as those offered by Apple. Go Microsoft!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have mixed thoughts. I use Bing a lot more than I ever thought I would (and I&#8217;ve been using Google since &#8216;98 or &#8216;99). I think Bing does a lot of things better than Google does. I do think that Bing does a better job of organizing its search results. The problem I see is that most web users should be savvy enough to refine their search terms to the point that their results don&#8217;t need much organization (thus mooting the benefit provided by Bing).</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s ads or a little silly. But they aren&#8217;t nearly as silly as those offered by Apple. Go Microsoft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do Free People Search Engines Work? &#124; islandpeoplesearch.com</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/is-anyone-overwhelmed-by-google-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-4058</link>
		<dc:creator>Do Free People Search Engines Work? &#124; islandpeoplesearch.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=3525#comment-4058</guid>
		<description>[...] Is anyone overwhelmed by Google search results? &#8211; Smooth Harold, The Blog of Blake Snow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is anyone overwhelmed by Google search results? &#8211; Smooth Harold, The Blog of Blake Snow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/is-anyone-overwhelmed-by-google-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-4056</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=3525#comment-4056</guid>
		<description>I think they have a pretty good ad campaign, but unfortunately, it does not match reality. Google&#039;s user experience is much better than what Bing offers.

Bing has pleasant background images. A great way to brand the product and contrast its difference with Google&#039;s stark white page. However, Google got it right. Bing&#039;s background image actually gives me one piece of information in a situation where I wouldn&#039;t normally have to process anything.

BTW, my favorite new addition on Google: The Google stars in search. It&#039;s not completely new, but Google&#039;s implemented it in a new way. Now, when I search on Google I see results on top of relevant pages that I starred across Google products. I&#039;ve found some really great resources with this tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they have a pretty good ad campaign, but unfortunately, it does not match reality. Google&#8217;s user experience is much better than what Bing offers.</p>
<p>Bing has pleasant background images. A great way to brand the product and contrast its difference with Google&#8217;s stark white page. However, Google got it right. Bing&#8217;s background image actually gives me one piece of information in a situation where I wouldn&#8217;t normally have to process anything.</p>
<p>BTW, my favorite new addition on Google: The Google stars in search. It&#8217;s not completely new, but Google&#8217;s implemented it in a new way. Now, when I search on Google I see results on top of relevant pages that I starred across Google products. I&#8217;ve found some really great resources with this tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

