wikipedia

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

The Truth According To Wikipedia raises important questions on accuracy, expertise, and group think

I just finished watching IJsbrand van Veelen’s excellent 50-minute documentary on the glamorization of amateur content producers and the potential negative effects that it may or may not have on society, especially as experts (informed individuals who work for, reason with, and experience wisdom) are waning in popularity. Here are some thoughts: (more…)

Comments (0)
READ MORE: Oh noes! The sky is falling!, Who spilled stupidity on my Internet?, documentary, editorials, internet, social web, videos, wikipedia
Friday, January 26, 2007

Wikipedia is hilarious… sorta

In doing some Wikipedia research last week on Bill O’Reilly, I found this little snippet of vandalism right under the “Politics” sub-section after four, well-constructed paragraphs: “Bill O’Reilly is also a douche who should never express his right winged opinion ever again.”

I couldn’t help but laugh at the little activist fellow who snuck that one in. The change in cadence was hilarious. And while I love Wikipedia, I do admit it that it takes an intelligent reader to spot entry vandalism on controversial subjects. Hence, you have to be a pretty savvy individual to spot the good from the bad. Furthermore, reports indicate that the reading level for the site is on a 10th grader level, much higher than the 6-8th grader level of most national publications. But more often than not, however, Wikipedia works like a balanced and well-written charm. It’s the closest “no spin zone” I’ve found on the internet.

See also:

Comments (5)
READ MORE: editorials, wikipedia